Total Posts: 5
| Main List | POST TO THIS TOPIC |
gammaburst Senior MemberPosts: 778
Reply | 8 Jun 2007, 16:52:04   Does, Or Will Rasputin Learn From Its' Mistakes? This question refers to Both versions of the type of chess 'Rasputin' can play. The worst-case scenario, I guess, would be for your computer-program to keep on playing the same "losing- line" {esp. in regular chess} ad infinitum, which can easily be determined from the "Results" page, and from which a number of Caissans' have in times past, padded to greatly padded their online-rating, as a result. I suppose that a randomly-inserted change {Re. a losing line-of-play} is better than nothing, but ideally, IMHO, Rasputin should eventually evolve into as strong a pro- gram as possible, in Both versions of chess! |
IsraeliProgram Senior Member United StatesPosts: 7
Reply | 8 Jun 2007, 19:06:37 In reply to gammaburst Re: Does, Or Will Rasputin Learn From Its' Mistakes? How do you propose to make Rasputin learn? How would that be programmed in? Are you referring purely to opening lines or would the code change? Do you know how difficult it is to program a chess engine? In the case of Chess960, once a certain way of winning is discovered from a certain starting position, how would Rasputin learn not to go down that road?
|
gammaburst Senior MemberPosts: 778
Reply | 8 Jun 2007, 20:34:06   Re: Does, Or Will Rasputin Learn From Its' Mistakes? ..Since I'm far from being any sort of computer-versed "geek," I must've grossly under-estimated the amount of effort re- quired in re-programming most game-playing computers, which given the present level of A.I. {artificial intelligence} finding the corrections to innumerable inferior-to-losing, lines-of-play {especially, in Chess-960} it would ultimately require a Whole Lot of 'hand-holding' {I mean, cooperation} between a superior chess-savvy team of experts, and computer-code "geeks"! The fact though, that in the world of top-level computer-chess- machines, that specialized news-outlets like "Chessbase.com" seem to imply in their reportage that every one or two years the top, or favored-to-win chess-engines become progressively 'stronger' in their search-ply-depth, and/or more narrow and harder-to-gauge 'chess sense', perhaps adds to this misperception! |
AdminBrian Administrator Posts: 393
Reply | 9 Jun 2007, 01:06:27 In reply to gammaburst Re: Does, Or Will Rasputin Learn From Its' Mistakes? There's no way to make the program "learn" so-to-speak, but we will be extending the functionality of the computer opponents in the future to allow for you to choose their rating level. Also options to play certain openings etc. Any suggestions on how to improve the computer opponents are welcome.
|
smjg Founding Member United KingdomPosts: 89
Reply | 9 Jun 2007, 21:53:41 In reply to AdminBrian Re: Does, Or Will Rasputin Learn From Its' Mistakes? I thought that was already what you were trying to do by having two computer oppenents, AgentSmith and Rasputin. Are we talking simply of adding more to cover a wider range of ratings, or is this something else you're planning to do?
|
| Main List | POST TO THIS TOPIC |

Senior Member
United States
Founding Member
United Kingdom