Caissa's Web free online chess
Game time is 07 Sep 2008 13:24 CDT (18:24 UTC)
Join Caissa's Web Chess
Join Caissa's Web Chess
Play Correspondence and Live Chess Online!
Total Posts: 5
Sort by: Post Time #/page:
Topic started by gammaburst on 8 Jun 2007, 16:52:04
gammaburst
Senior Member
Posts: 778
Reply
8 Jun 2007, 16:52:04
 
Does, Or Will Rasputin Learn From Its' Mistakes?
This question refers to Both versions of the type of
chess 'Rasputin' can play.
The worst-case scenario, I guess, would be for your
computer-program to keep on playing the same "losing-
line" {esp. in regular chess} ad infinitum, which can
easily be determined from the "Results" page, and from
which a number of Caissans' have in times past, padded
to greatly padded their online-rating, as a result.
 
I suppose that a randomly-inserted change {Re. a losing
line-of-play} is better than nothing, but ideally, IMHO,
Rasputin should eventually evolve into as strong a pro-
gram as possible, in Both versions of chess!
IsraeliProgram
Senior Member
United States
Posts: 7
Reply
8 Jun 2007, 19:06:37
In reply to gammaburst
Re: Does, Or Will Rasputin Learn From Its' Mistakes?
How do you propose to make Rasputin learn? How would that be programmed in? Are you referring purely to opening lines or would the code change? Do you know how difficult it is to program a chess engine? In the case of Chess960, once a certain way of winning is discovered from a certain starting position, how would Rasputin learn not to go down that road?
gammaburst
Senior Member
Posts: 778
Reply
8 Jun 2007, 20:34:06
 
Re: Does, Or Will Rasputin Learn From Its' Mistakes?
..Since I'm far from being any sort of computer-versed "geek,"
I must've grossly under-estimated the amount of effort re-
quired in re-programming most game-playing computers, which
given the present level of A.I. {artificial intelligence} finding
the corrections to innumerable inferior-to-losing, lines-of-play
{especially, in Chess-960} it would ultimately require a Whole
Lot of 'hand-holding' {I mean, cooperation} between a superior
chess-savvy team of experts, and computer-code "geeks"!
 
The fact though, that in the world of top-level computer-chess-
machines, that specialized news-outlets like "Chessbase.com"
seem to imply in their reportage that every one or two years
the top, or favored-to-win chess-engines become progressively
'stronger' in their search-ply-depth, and/or more narrow and
harder-to-gauge 'chess sense', perhaps adds to this misperception!
AdminBrian
Administrator
Posts: 393
Reply
9 Jun 2007, 01:06:27
In reply to gammaburst
Re: Does, Or Will Rasputin Learn From Its' Mistakes?
There's no way to make the program "learn" so-to-speak, but we will be extending the functionality of the computer opponents in the future to allow for you to choose their rating level. Also options to play certain openings etc. Any suggestions on how to improve the computer opponents are welcome.
smjg
Founding Member
United Kingdom
Posts: 89
Reply
9 Jun 2007, 21:53:41
In reply to AdminBrian
Re: Does, Or Will Rasputin Learn From Its' Mistakes?
I thought that was already what you were trying to do by having two computer oppenents, AgentSmith and Rasputin. Are we talking simply of adding more to cover a wider range of ratings, or is this something else you're planning to do?